Part I - SPEAKING HEART TO HEART
Jim Lynch and I have been
close personal friends as well as professional colleagues for over a
quarter of a century. I have reported on some of his research and
literary achievements in various Newsletters over the past two decades
and have also had the privilege and pleasure of participating in some
of these efforts. I was therefore delighted and intrigued when he
recently told me that he was curtailing his clinical practice to devote
more time to his next book, Speaking
of Love
. What I gleaned from our brief phone conversation
is that he intends to focus on how what saying "I love you" face to
face to someone and really feeling this emotion affects our
cardiovascular system and health. This news came at a most propitious
time. I had long intended to devote a Newsletter to an interview with
Jim that would explain how and why he became interested in the effect
of emotions and personal relationships on the cardiovascular system.
Jim immediately agreed to my proposal and after we hung up, I began
thinking about what he said. Love is a word that is very often used in
a casual or frivolous way, especially in letters, cards, or e-mails.
Perhaps Jim intends to explain what is different about telling someone
"I love you" directly when, in his words, "it is spoken in
one’s flesh and blood in an embodied rather than the
disembodied delivery" when these same words are communicated in writing
or over the phone.
While this was the first issue I wanted to address, it seemed wiser to
start by providing some background on what led him to write his
previous three books. I could have probably summarized many of these
details to conserve space but was sure our readers would be much more
interested in learning about this directly from Jim. I also felt that
each of these prior books reflected a progressive evolution in his
thinking about the importance of things like loneliness, caring for
people and pets and feeling love for someone or something, as well as
how such things affected physical and mental well-being. The following
questions and answers are designed to illustrate what I perceive to be
an orderly sequence in his books that has culminated in Speaking of Love .
PJR:
Jim, your first book, The
Broken Heart: The Medical Consequences of Loneliness
,
started with this 1973 quotation from a 35-year old steelworker at the
top of the first page. "Man, you must be kidding about love? I think
our young college kids must have latched on to something. Why get
married when you can simply screw some young chick and nobody gets
hurt. In the end you owe her nothing and she owes you nothing." The
first paragraph begins with "There is a widespread belief in our modern
culture that love is a word with no meaning." It goes on to state that
a whole generation agrees with the steelworker and also believes that
"You can be intimate with someone and then leave, and nothing bad will
happen." The Broken
Heart
refuted this by brilliantly demonstrating how
important human relationships are to physical and mental health. It
would thus appear that Speaking
of Love
deals with a topic that has probably preoccupied you for over thirty
years. I know some of the answers to these questions but suspect that
our readers would be interested in learning why you became interested
in investigating the health effects of human relationships. In
particular, could you tell us a little about Horsley Gantt and the
influence he and others like Stewart Wolf had on your early
development? More specifically, what led you to write The Broken Heart?
JJL:
I suppose it all started in 1962 when I had the good fortune to meet
Dr. Horsley Gantt as the result of having received a Veterans
Administration Fellowship. I had been assigned to work in his Pavlovian
Laboratory at the Perry Point, VA facility located along the banks of
the Susquehanna River, where it flows into the Chesapeake Bay. By way
of background, Horsley had spent almost 7 years in Russia from
1922-1929 studying with the renowned Ivan Pavlov and translating his
publications into English. He had been sent to Leningrad as a young
medical officer to help in the famine relief that followed in the wake
of the Bolshevik Revolution. He subsequently wrote a book on the
effects of famine and social upheaval on the spread of disease in
Russia that is widely regarded as one of the first epidemiologic
classics in this field. When he returned to Johns Hopkins in 1929 he
established his Pavlovian Laboratory and spent the next several decades
extending Pavlov's research studies on conditional reflexes and the
power of human contact. During his long and distinguished career
Horsley had been the recipient of numerous honors and awards, including
the prestigious "Lasker Award in Medicine" and the "Distinguished
Service Award from the American Heart Association". Nevertheless, he
found it difficult to obtain funding for his studies until the Russians
launched Sputnik in 1957 and Yuri Gagarin later became the first person
to circle the earth in space. That started the space race to beat the
Russians to the moon.
Dr. Gantt was only one of a handful of U.S. physicians who could not
only speak and read Russian fluently but was also familiar with Russian
medicine and science. Because of this, the National Institutes of
Health and Veterans Administration were anxious to support his studies
and his dream of establishing a second Pavlovian laboratory at the
Perry Point VA hospital in the Maryland countryside became a reality. I
doubt that any words could convey either the impact of meeting Horsley
Gantt or observing the research he was conducting on what he referred
to as "The Effect of Person". Little did I know that he would be my
teacher and mentor for the next 18 years until he died in 1980 at the
age of 88. My experiences with Horsley in the early 1960s proved to be
the defining intellectual and philosophical experience of my life.
It was in Horsley's laboratory that I first witnessed the remarkable
cardiovascular responses in dogs to the most elementary interactions
with people, usually as a byproduct of certain surgical procedures for
some of his other animal experiments. Heart rate reductions of 50% in
response to human petting were routine reactions. Coronary blood flow
increases to the mere presence of a human being far greater than those
seen with the most vigorous exercise on a treadmill were responses that
would form a deep and lasting impression. They still help shape my
research interests with patients suffering from cardiovascular and
other diseases 40 years later.
The Land Of
The Serendip
 The photograph on the right shows Horsley Gantt
teaching me how to create a parotid fistula in dogs for some studies
that dealt with salivary conditioning. I am not certain how old Horsley
might have been when this picture was taken but it is safe to say he
was probably in his mid seventies. As you well know, in my last book, A Cry Unheard , I
described this era in my life as "The Land of Serendip" because it had
been pure serendipity that led me to meet such a marvelous human being
and to select and be accepted at the Perry Point facility.
At the time, I had no particular interest in either human relationships
or cardiovascular disease and was unaware of any possible connection.
My major concern and goal was to be able to make a living so I could
get married. Perry Point just happened to be the closest facility to
Boston with an opening. This was very important, since it made it
financially feasible to spend some weekends with my New England
fiancée.
Horsley had established the Pavlovian Society in 1955 at The Johns
Hopkins Medical School to foster an integrative approach to medical
research and clinical practice. It was dedicated to the scientific
study of behavior and the promotion of interdisciplinary scientific
communication. At the time, most medical and scientific organizations
were already tending to become more and more specialized in one
specific area but the Pavlovian Society was quite different. While it
recognized the value of clinical studies as well as research at a
molecular or other basic science level, it's focus was on making its
members stress the significance of their scientific observations as it
related to the whole functioning organism. The membership initially
consisted primarily of Horsley's friends, former students, and
colleagues and meetings were generally held in Baltimore. By the time I
met him, Horsley's invigorating influence had attracted numerous other
physicians, psychologists and scientists and the venue had expanded to
Princeton, Harvard, Columbia and the University of Virginia. The
intellectual stimulation these individuals provided was another of
those life-forming experiences that is difficult to describe. Meetings
at the Princeton Inn and Boar's Head Inn in Charlottesville where I was
able to dine with and listen to giants in the field of behavioral
psychology, like B.F. Skinner from Harvard and William Schoenfeld of
Columbia, or hear the great American novelist John Dos Passos lecture
on the diversity of Nature, remain memories that are beyond
description.
Click to view larger image
|
The
Gantt Medal was established following Horsley's death in 1980 to be
awarded to individuals who have made distinguished contributions to the
field or contributed significantly to the functioning of the Pavlovian
Society. (I was privileged to receive this award 15 years
later).
|
Click to view larger image
|
The
society rapidly became international in scope. In addition to
luminaries like Harold Wolff, B.F. Skinner, Stewart Wolf and William
Schoenfeld, past presidents have included our good friends Konstantin
Sudakov from Russia and Shoji Kakigi from Japan. They, Stewart and I
were very pleased that you were elected president in 1999.
Horsley introduced me to numerous scientists and writers, chief among
them Stewart Wolf, M.D. Not only did Stewart leave a deep and lasting
impression on me because of his wonderful way of encouraging young
investigators but his books, especially Life Stress and Essential
Hypertension
, had an especially powerful impact. I could
never understand why his writings did not have a greater influence on
clinical cardiologists. However, that has now changed due to your
efforts, Ray Rosenman's and other good friends who are also on the
Board of Trustees of The American Institute of Stress. Stewart's
decades of landmark investigations in the town of Roseto also served to
reinforce the importance of human relationships on health. I thought it
was especially appropriate for him to receive the Hans Selye Award when
he provided the first 25-year follow-up on Roseto at your 1988 Montreux
International Congress on Stress in Switzerland, particularly since the
presentation elegantly and dramatically confirmed his original
hypothesis. Parenthetically, I will always be grateful to you for
arranging financial support for me to attend these marvelous Montreux
meetings.
Without Stewart Wolf, the Pavlovian Society would never have survived
after Horsley's death in 1980. The title of the organization's journal,
"Conditional Reflex" had been changed to "The Pavlovian Journal of
Biological Science" by the new editor but no longer reflected the
integrative approach that Horsley had emphasized. It was not until
Stewart took over the reins in 1990 and changed the title of the
journal to Integrative
Physiological and Behavioral Science
that things got back
on track. As you know, Paul, Stewart Wolf and many of the others I met
through the Pavlovian Society were real giants and marvelous human
beings. They made science and research a pure joy. Unfortunately, when
Stewart ceased functioning as Editor and spiritual head of the Society
the entire focus of the Society was diverted from its original goals to
evolve into a far more narrowly focused reductionistic psychological
society. You were the last President who aspired to hold up
Horsley’s original ideals of a broad intellectual and
integrative society. After your tenure as President, the new directions
and zeitgeist
of the Society left Stewart, me, you and others with no option but to
resign in protest.
Our
Psychophysiologic Clinic And Laboratory
In 1967, after Horsley
stepped down as Director of the Pavlovian Laboratory at The Johns
Hopkins Medical School, I decided to accept a faculty position at the
University of Pennsylvania Medical School where I began for the first
time to conduct human research on hypnosis and its potential links to
the recently emergent field of biofeedback. A series of studies I
subsequently published on alpha wave biofeedback demonstrated that
there was no validity to the prior claims that human beings could
control their brain wave activity via operant conditioning. I also
wrote several articles at that time asserting that biofeedback was
little more than an epiphenomenon - a discovery that would subsequently
come to shape my very different approach to the non-pharmacologic
control of human blood pressure. After a year at Penn, Dr. Gantt
enticed me to come back to Baltimore. I also owed my position as
Professor and Director of the Psychophysiologic Clinic and laboratory
at the University of Maryland School of Medicine to Horsley as well. It
was there that I began to extend his observations on the "Effect of
Person" to coronary care and shock trauma patients. Just as I had
witnessed in his laboratory, the powerful impact of transient human
interactions was quickly apparent. To get back to your inquiry, these
observations naturally led to the question. "What
impact does the chronic absence of human relationships have on our
health?"
In my first book The Broken Heart I
was able to utilize the 1960 health census (the first census to ever
include marital status) to show that those who lived alone had markedly
higher death rates. At all ages, for all races and for both sexes, the
death rates were two to ten times higher! I apologize for the rambling
nature of this response but your question resurrected several strong
memories and opinions and I appreciated the opportunity to get some of
these off my chest and share them with your readers.
PJR:
There is little doubt that The
Broken Heart
touched a very sensitive nerve. It was on the
cover of US World and
News Report
, was featured as a centerfold in People Magazine,
discussed in virtually every major magazine and newspaper and was
subsequently translated into a dozen or more foreign languages. In it,
you detailed your experiences with the powerful effects of human
contact, particularly in coronary care and shock trauma units. You also
illustrated the
devastating effects that lack of meaningful and close personal contact
could have on health
and backed it up with statistical
proof. How did physicians and the health care system react to all of
this?
JJL:
The publication of The
Broken Heart
proved to be a major turning point in my
life. Prior to that, I was quite content to live my life strictly as a
basic scientist, little interested in the practical or clinical
implications of my own research observations. (Living under the
tutelage of Horsley Gantt had introduced me to what was in essence a
wonderful type of intellectual and relatively secluded academic life).
I had originally intended to write this book primarily for
cardiologists and it was Martin Kessler at Basic Books who helped
shaped the larger implications surrounding issues of human loneliness
and physical disease. It was only years later that I realized how
fortunate I was to have such an extraordinary editor and my good luck
to have met such an outstanding human being during a period when I was
extremely naive about the publishing industry. Several other much
larger publishing houses that also offered much larger advances would
have published it but I suspect that the final version would have been
quite different. In any event while writing The Broken Heart I
was also preparing for what I perceived would be serious objections
from many proponents of the mechanistic medical establishment. I was
therefore shocked when not one, but two editorials appeared in The Journal of The American
Medical Association
strongly urging physicians to read
my book. Even more surprising was the response from the public media.
Highly favorable comments quickly appeared in virtually every major
newspaper, magazine and television program, not only in the U.S. but
all over the world. The message appeared to be universally accepted
that loneliness was a major plague in our midst and I can’t
recall a single hostile response other than the first ad hominem attack
in the New York Times
Book Review section that referred to me as a "dangerous Billy Graham".
I was devastated until four days later, Lehman Haupt's glowing review
in the weekly edition made it "Book of the Times". I owe to
Lehman’s New
York Times
review the ultimate success of the book and
strongly suspect that Martin Kessler had a great deal to do with
getting it re-reviewed but could never prove this. As you noted, it
clearly had struck a very deep nerve about problems that were difficult
for me to fully appreciate because of my own relatively young age.
For the first time in my life I was also invited to lecture quite
widely on the topic of loneliness and disease, not only in America but
also in Europe, Asia and Australia. During these presentations I began
to hear the same three questions over and over again. One was about
mechanisms. People would routinely ask me, "How
does a person go from being lonely to developing hypertension or
coronary heart disease, or various malignancies? What are the
mechanisms?"
The second was about
treatment. Presuming
a person was lonely what could he or she do to prevent premature death?
And the third question was more
philosophical; why
did loneliness appear to be growing in our midst, especially since we
had developed ever increasingly sophisticated means of communicating
with one another?
Such mechanistic questions had intrigued me long before The Broken Heart
was published, stirred in part by two quite disparate interests. The
first came from Ken Gimbel, a cardiologist (later to become a very dear
friend) who was in charge of the coronary care unit at the University
of Maryland Hospital at that time. He had permitted a coterie of
nurses, then seeking Masters degrees under my tutelage, to conduct a
variety of research projects on the effects of human touch and human
interactions on the heart rate and heart rhythm of patients in the
coronary care unit. Sue Thomas, who was the first nurse to conduct her
own masters' thesis under my direction, had introduced me to the
research needs and interests of nurses. She later became a dynamic and
integral part of my interest in developing a program to treat issues
related to loneliness in heart disease patients. Although Ken's
influence was more tangential, it was equally crucial. I used to joke
that in a previous life he must have been the Devil's Advocate in the
Papal College of Cardinals. Whenever we would observe certain
remarkable changes in heart rate or rhythm in coronary care patients to
human touch, he would quickly challenge the observations. "How do you
know" he would quip, "that the change was in response to touch? How do
you know the patients did not move their muscles or change their
breathing patterns? Frequently stymied by this line of questioning, I
would respond by asking him how he would answer such "penetrating"
questions, whereupon he would suggest the next research project. The
elimination of all extraneous factors in response to human touch was
finally settled by studying patients in our Shock Trauma unit who were
paralyzed by d-tubo-curarine, artificially respirated, often comatose,
and rarely had significant heart disease. His good-natured kidding
extended beyond the publication of The
Broken Heart
when he finally challenged me to "do
something about the problem" with heart patients and human loneliness
rather than merely speculate about these connections from a safe
empirical and purely scientific distance.
PJR: How did this
lead to your subsequent interest in seemingly unrelated items such as
alexithymia, the effect of talking and communication on blood pressure,
factors that influenced this or how caring for pets could influence
your blood pressure and health as well as theirs? I recall that this
last topic also attracted tremendous media interest that included two
interviews on 60 Minutes.
JJL:
After The Broken Heart
was published the central issue became one of mechanisms: how did one
go from loneliness to coronary heart disease, hypertension as well as a
large number of other physical diseases? (This was an era in the late
seventies when the only way one could measure blood pressure was with a
stethoscope or arterial line.) Our initial perspective was completely
conventional, dominated by our assumptions that loneliness was just one
additional "risk factor" in a variance equation of multiple risk
factors for cardiovascular disease. Like diet and exercise we thought
of loneliness as one additional risk factor, albeit a surprisingly
strong one for coronary heart disease. (We were also quite mindful of
the inherent limitations of the risk factors that had resulted from the
Framingham Heart Study, and cognizant of several biases that were
embedded in their publications).
My initial perspective, however, was that human loneliness could be
best thought of as just an additional stressor contributing to heart
disease, and could be understood within the framework of the "fight or
flight" response outlined by Walter Cannon and the subsequent expansion
of his research by Hans Selye's General Adaptation Syndrome. By the
mid-seventies, it had become much more widely accepted that stress was
linked to the development of heart disease and to hypertension. Stewart
Wolf's 1955 book, Life
Stress and Essential Hypertension
had demonstrated
convincingly that stress interviews could lead to major increases in
blood pressure, blood viscosity, and major changes in renal blood flow.
Before 1960 there were no effective anti-hypertensive medications and
when Stewart wrote his book, radical sympathectomy was required to
treat patients who would have otherwise surely have died from severe
hypertension.
Franz Alexander, whom Freud referred to as his most brilliant student
in the U.S., co-founded the journal Psychosomatic Medicine
in 1939. The first paper that appeared in it was "Emotional Factors in
Essential Hypertension", in which Alexander proposed that suppressed
anger was a major factor in many cases. By 1960, his status as a
preeminent psychoanalyst was widely acknowledged by his peers, as was
the link between stress and hypertension, so it is not surprising that
many psychiatrists began to use Freudian analysis to treat hypertensive
patients. Again and again it was shown that early developmental traumas
could be linked to the subsequent development of adult hypertension. Yet,
despite the patient's presumed increased insight regarding possible
developmental and other emotional contributors to this disease, blood
pressure continued to rise as therapy "progressed". Studies showed that
the higher the basal blood pressure, the more rapidly patients stopped
their psychotherapy and our subsequent research suggested a possible
explanation for this wise decision.
By the mid-seventies it was generally acknowledged that psychotherapy
not only did not help patients with hypertensive heart disease, but
that it might make it worse. In one sense, providing insight seemed to
hasten the development of hypertension. On the other hand, various
non-verbal approaches did not seem to be very effective either. This
was an era when "biofeedback" was in great vogue. From my own research
and perspective on alpha-wave biofeedback, as well as my personal
epistemological interests, I had previously vehemently asserted that
biofeedback in the operant conditioning sense (that is, the voluntary
control of the autonomic nervous system) made no empirical or
epistemological sense whatsoever in several papers on this topic. Thus,
when we first began to think about treating patients suffering from
loneliness and heart disease, the only approach that made any sense at
that time was Herb Benson's Relaxation Response. Benson's approach to
regulating blood pressure relied heavily on focused meditation and
deep, regular breathing in a quiet atmosphere. Although this and
similar approaches appeared to offer promise, their overall
effectiveness produced only minimal reductions in blood pressure. In
addition, since the technique was solitary in nature, it did not seem
to offer a way to get at the problems afflicting patients who were
already chronically lonely.
PJR:
Can you tell us a little about your Psychophysiological Clinic, the
"green machine", your sabbatical in Ireland and your experience with
Irish babies?
JJL:
When I first opened the Psychophysiological Clinic at the University of
Maryland Medical School with Herb Gross (a marvelous psychoanalyst and
professor of psychiatry who subsequently became a life-long friend) we
were aware of two problems. If we tried to get patients to talk about
their problems and address their loneliness, as had been tried since
the mid-thirties, it would only serve to drive up blood pressure.
Catharsis also did not seem to be helpful. New technology would later
allow me to witness striking examples in patients undergoing cardiac
rehabilitation where catharsis seemed quite likely to be potentially
harmful. In addition we had no way to measure blood pressure on a
continual basis as Stewart Wolf had accomplished, when he catheterized
his patients and confirmed that stressful topics would cause blood
pressure to rise. Almost as if fate itself was guiding our way, the
very first patient sent to our clinic was a prominent University
Professor. He was 55 years of age, single, and was suffering from
chronic hypertension that had been poorly controlled with medications.
Four years earlier, he had suffered a myocardial infarction and was now
experiencing episodes of transient ischemia. Just prior to coming to
our clinic, he also reported having increasing attacks of dizziness
while lecturing to students.
All in all he appeared to be an ambulatory statistic from The Broken Heart,
except for the fact that he denied he was lonely. Our approach was
dictated by extreme caution, oriented towards Hippocrates' golden
principle of primum non
nocere
("First, do no harm"). Thus, I tried to avoid
discussing issues that appeared to be emotionally provocative. If he
raised such issues I would instruct him to be quiet, breathe deeply,
while a nurse took his pressure. After denying his loneliness he then
began to discuss the problems he was facing in trying to date a
recently divorced woman who also taught at the University. As we gave
him advice and assisted in other ways to help him in his attempts to
strengthen his liaison with the object of his affection, his blood
pressure started to slowly fall back down to normotensive levels. I had
helped the professor to lower his blood pressure by helping him to
date!
Moreover, the pressure reductions
were ten times
greater than those that had been reported by Herb Benson. Yet, I
had no clue as to what precisely had contributed to this surprising
success.
There are certain moments when technological advances are so dramatic
that they open up worlds that have never been seen before. The Hubble
telescope, for example, opened up dimensions of the universe that could
never have been seen before that magnificent instrument was launched
into space. The same is true of the computerized, automated blood
pressure machine. Without that marvelous device it would have been far
more difficult to decode what I was later able to conceive as "The
Language of the Heart". Shortly after publication of The Broken Heart I
had the good fortune to meet Dr. Michael Ramsey. It was 1978 and I had
been invited to deliver a keynote address to several thousand nurses at
the Annual convention of Critical Care Nurses in St. Louis. During a
noontime break I met Dr. Ramsey in the exhibition hall where he was
demonstrating his recent technological breakthrough; the Dinamap
computerized instrument that could reliably and automatically measure
blood pressure and heart rate on a minute-to-minute basis. While this
"green machine' would soon find its way into virtually every surgical
suite in the world, at that time it was just being acquired by a
division of Johnson and Johnson. After chatting for an hour or so about
other potential uses to help treat hypertensive individuals without
drugs, Dr. Ramsey was kind enough to donate several of his Dinamap
devices to our Psychophysiological Clinic.
He had casually mentioned during our conversations that he was having
trouble marketing this to doctors because blood pressures changed so
rapidly that the average clinician assumed the machine was not
reliable. Prior to the development of the Dinamap, blood pressure was
recorded with a stethoscope and the average physician had come to
assume it only changed slowly over time rather than rapidly within a
minute. I assured him that my experience monitoring blood pressure in
dogs with indwelling catheters had made it readily apparent that blood
pressure could indeed change very quickly and often quite dramatically.
Yet, when I started testing this new way of measuring it in patients
when they began speaking, I was similarly stunned to see the prompt and
powerful surges in blood pressure. These increases were so great that
we also assumed the machine was faulty and took it to the cardiac
catheter laboratory to compare and cross correlate its results with
those obtained from indwelling catheters. The Dinamap proved to be
remarkably accurate.
We quickly tested both hypertensive as well as normotensive patients
and found that everyone's BP promptly rose as soon as they started to
speak. The degree of elevation was between ten and fifty percent within
thirty seconds and we also observed that the higher the resting BP the
more it increased when they talked. The correlation was over .92. No
antihypertensive drug was able to block these blood pressure increases
and some made it worse.
Equally intriguing
was the fact
that this communicative response primarily affected blood pressure
since there was no significant change in heart rate. (A similar
phenomenon occurred in deaf mutes when they tried to communicate by
signing but not when they moved their hands in a meaningless fashion.)
I had planned to take a six-month sabbatical leave in Ireland in 1978
after The Broken Heart
appeared but was faced with a peculiar and perplexing paradox. Since I
had asserted that loneliness was a major contributor to cardiovascular
disease and later found that talking elicited major increases in blood
pressure, it
appeared that I was now simultaneously claiming that loneliness was a
major health hazard but that talking to someone might also be hazardous
.
It would take several years for me to
eventually realize that those
whose pressures rose the greatest were the very same individuals who
had the most difficulty in communicating openly and honestly and were
therefore more likely to become isolated and lonely
.
When we first observed the sharp rise in pressure while speaking, we
immediately began to suspect that it cast doubt on epidemiological
studies linking BP to heart disease. It was obvious that blood
pressures taken with a stethoscope would be influenced by who had been
talking just before the measurement. We also began to wonder about the
mechanisms contributing to these sudden increases. We assumed that the
major cause had to be a sudden increase in peripheral resistance, which
we were able to prove in subsequent research studies. What made our
findings even more intriguing was that unlike
the "fight or flight" response, heart rate did not rise significantly
while talking whereas blood pressure increased dramatically
.
Our subsequent studies showed that other physiological mechanisms
contributed to these pressure increases, including increased
intrapleural pressure, sudden reduction in respiration patterns, and
greater left ventricular ejectile force. However, the most important
was the abrupt rise in peripheral resistance, which was of particular
interest since I had
seen several patients with severe premature coronary heart disease
despite the fact that they had exercised regularly all of their adult
life
. It seemed clear to me that exercise was
designed
to increase stroke volume and that it was always accompanied by
peripheral vasodilatation. It also became apparent that certain
individuals with excellent stroke volume as a result of regular
exercise could still show extraordinary rises in blood pressure (via
sudden increases in peripheral resistance) when they had difficulty
communicating. Such repeated pressure surges were so dramatic that it
was highly likely that they would damage the inner surface of coronary
arteries resulting in sites that favored the formation of
atherosclerotic plaque. It thus seemed highly unlikely to me that one
could exercise for their cardiovascular health and obtain any benefit
if he or she were also arguing with their mates. I began to speculate
that there were two different set and setting modes that determined
cardiovascular health; one involving exercise physiology, the other
involving what we later came to call "communicative physiology".
My Sabbatical
In Ireland
Although I was eager to explore this I was also intent on taking my
sabbatical in Ireland to oversee the restoration of my mother-in-law's
home in the tiny town of Culdaff, on the Inishowen Peninsula. That
remote peninsula was also the birthplace of both of my own parents and
I had a keen desire to rediscover my roots. I also thought about
examining some patrons of a local Irish pub, since I was quite certain
that alcohol consumption would help reduce these pressure surges while
talking. I reasoned that since alcohol is a vasodilator it should act
to help reduce vasoconstriction while talking and thus enhance
communication by reducing the workload on the cardiovascular system. I
never did do this study since there was no way to hook up the Dinamap
in a barroom in the boondocks of this backwoods area. In addition, my
Irish compatriots would not permit this technological invasion into
their last oasis of cultural sanity.
While recognizing that it would not be possible to monitor the effects
of alcohol consumption on communicative blood pressure surges, a series
of circuitous accidents led me to investigate the blood pressures of
newborn infants in an Irish Hospital in Dublin. Prior to the
development of automated methods to measure blood pressure it was not
possible to hear the muffled Korotkoff sounds in a newborn baby. Within
a few weeks I began to regularly observe with the Dinamap that when a
newborn begins to cry, blood pressure quickly increases, frequently
doubling within 15-30 seconds. As in Baltimore, I concluded that this
was due to the physiological stress of crying and this was merely
another example of how stress could elevate blood pressure.
This perspective changed dramatically one miserable, cold, wind-swept
rainy day (it had been raining continuously for four weeks when I
arrived in Ireland in April of that year) when it suddenly occurred to
me that those babies were really doubling their blood pressures. I
reflected on my own propensity to blush quite easily, and the thought
began to enter my awareness that these blood pressures surges,
especially in adult hypertensive patients, could be the counterpart of
a baby's cry. I thought especially about the professor whose blood
pressure had fallen over 50 mm/hg without our ability to explain what
was responsible for this. I began to reason that perhaps, like a
mother, we had heard the professor’s cries by unwittingly
reacting to his pressure surges as a hidden form of crying. In a sense,
I
started to suspect we had "mothered" his pressure down to normal by
simply caring for him
. Similarly, it suddenly
became
obvious that my
own blushing was in fact a "vascular message" that displayed my
discomfort to others. It was not just a phenomenon of vasodilatation
but rather had real meaning because it could be seen by others who
might respond to it in some appropriate fashion
.
I also
began to realize the enormous influence of René Descartes,
who had convinced almost everyone to uncritically assume that the human
body was essentially nothing more than a collection of mechanisms
designed for self-preservation and had no connection with the mind,
which was beyond man's ken. A heart that spoke was in fact far more
interesting than a heart that was a mere pump! While it was clear that
a great deal more needed to be understood mechanistically about the
links between talking and blood pressure increases, such surges
represented a hidden analogue of my own blushing and a concealed form
of caring that could also not be felt or seen by anyone. Even before
leaving Ireland at the end of my sabbatical it was clear that there was
a "Language of the Heart" and that the human body was inextricably
involved in all dialogue. It also became equally clear that many
instances of premature disease could be the result of a breakdown in
dialogue and communication due to a failure to reveal or decode the
language of one’s own heart or the hearts of others.
PJR:
I would like to go back to my previous question dealing with how
alexithymia, various factors that influenced the degree of blood
pressure rise while talking or caring for pets could influence your
blood pressure and health as well as theirs. (I recall that this last
topic also attracted tremendous media interest that included two
interviews on 60 Minutes.)
How did these and your other research studies help you decode The Language of the Heart ,
which was the title of your next book?
Meeting Paul
Rosch
JJL:
Returning from Ireland with this new perspective on the implications of
the communicative blood pressure surges I had observed, our research
team made an all out effort on several fronts simultaneously. We had
demonstrated that the higher the resting blood pressure the more it
increased when talking. We later identified other seemingly diverse
influences that could consistently magnify or diminish such surges in
normotensive as well as hypertensive individuals. How these varied
effects were achieved or could be taken advantage of to benefit
patients was not clear and mandated several lines of investigation.
First we needed to delineate what physiological mechanisms were
contributing to these sudden surges. Second we needed to grasp what
dimensions of the broad spectrum of human communication influenced the
magnitude of these changes. And finally we needed to utilize this new
information to develop an entirely new approach to helping patients
suffering from a variety of stress/communicative diseases.
It was shortly after returning to the States that I first met you, a
chance encounter that was destined to have a profound and both
clinically and personally very meaningful influence on all of my future
work. I was lecturing at a conference for physical fitness personnel in
Boca Raton in early 1979, demonstrating the way blood pressure rapidly
increases when a person speaks. You were also one of the featured
speakers and I still clearly remember the very first thing you said to
me after that talk, "That was among the most outrageous but interesting
talks I have ever attended." Almost as if I had been waiting to meet
someone like you all of my life - an internist educated in the
classical sense, a clinician with a stunning knowledge of the links
between stress and disease, and a man I would forever affectionately
call my "Yeshiva Bucher", in its meaning as a true scholar. We talked
long into that night. For the first time I met a student of Hans Selye
and in turn introduced him to one of Ivan Pavlov's last living
students, and by proxy his academic grandchild.
You seemed to grasp the clinical implications of these
communicative/pressure surges even more clearly than I did. You also
grasped the need to present this information to patients in a graphic
way that would help them get acquainted with their own hidden feelings
and concealed stresses while communicating. We talked about the concept
of "alexithymia" – a word used by investigators at the
Massachusetts General Hospital to describe the fact that many patients
suffering from psychophysiological diseases had no words for their
feelings. Others had referred to this large class of patients as
"emotional illiterates", patients who had no insight into their own
feelings. Our computer technology now allowed us to understand that
many patients simply could not sense their major blood pressure surges,
and thus had no way to "feel their own feelings". The need for graphic
technologies to demonstrate this was clear and you made a very
substantial contribution to our research out of your own pocket. It was
the first support that we had ever received for our work and it came at
a very crucial time in my academic career. Your enthusiasm for our
discoveries, and your subsequent involvement in many of our future
studies was the
élan vital
that forged our research efforts
for the next two decades.
The period from 1979 to 1988 was one of intensive research. At any one
time there were at least a dozen studies being conducted on various
dimensions of the links between blood pressure and talking. A series of
physiological studies were carried out to define the primary mechanisms
contributing to the magnitude of the elevations while talking. In
addition to those previously mentioned we also observed the importance
of renal function. With your help we also began to study patients who
had undergone heart transplants. Since their hearts were denervated,
this allowed us to further demonstrate the neurohumoral contributions
to communicative blood pressure increases. We later demonstrated that
heart transplant patients could utilize the information provided by our
studies to utilize a new treatment approach that could significantly
lower their blood pressure, reduce reliance on medications, and even
lower heart rate over time!
The links between pressure increases and peripheral vasoconstriction
were especially intriguing because it helped to explain why many people
who exercised regularly might nevertheless be vulnerable to developing
premature coronary heart disease. As noted previously, it quickly
became apparent that individuals whose physical condition was excellent
but who had trouble communicating exhibited far greater increases in
blood pressure than others when they began to talk, especially about
emotionally evocative topics. I am getting ahead of myself but in my
third book, A Cry
Unheard
, I discussed why Jim Fixx, the original guru of
running, died prematurely of a myocardial infarction. As I noted, he
may truly have personified "The loneliness of the long distance
runner", a phrase that became popular because of a 1962 movie with that
title. In other studies we
also showed that virtually all patients with documented coronary heart
disease (even on multiple antihypertensive drugs) exhibit far greater
increases while talking than during maximal treadmill exercise. This
information was also used to develop a new clinical way to help
patients to improve their overall cardiovascular health during
cardiovascular rehabilitation.
PJR:
I have a very vivid recollection of the first time we met and
Marguerite recently reminded me about how I brought you to our Florida
home where you played the piano until the wee hours of the morning and
sang obscure Irish ballads. You brought back a flood of other memories
of my subsequent appointment as Clinical Professor of Medicine In
Psychiatry at the University of Maryland and the
apparent paradox that beta blockers made blood pressure surges while
talking worse
and how we finally figured
out the
explanation for this. Jim Fixx, the paragon of cardiovascular fitness
whose Complete Book of
Running
started the 1970's jogging craze, died suddenly at
the age of 52 while jogging alone on a remote Vermont road. His autopsy
showed that one of his coronary arteries was 99% clogged, another was
80% obstructed, and a third was 70% blocked and that he had three other
apparently silent heart attacks in the months or weeks prior to his
death. He had just gone through his second divorce and was indeed an
example of a lonely person as well as a lonely long distance runner
according to several accounts.
Part II
-
SPEAKING
OF
LOVE
Part I of this interview
dealt with how Jim Lynch came to Horsley Gantt's laboratory in 1962
because it was the only facility with an opening close enough to make
it financially feasible for him to visit his fiancée in
Boston on weekends. Gantt, who was to become his mentor for the next
two decades, had studied with the renowned Ivan Pavlov in Russia from
1922 to 1929, when he returned to The Johns Hopkins Medical School to
establish his Pavlovian Laboratory. His subsequent demonstration of the
profound influence human contact had on cardiovascular responses in
laboratory animals made an indelible impression on Jim, as did the
Pavlovian Society that Gantt had established at Johns Hopkins in 1955.
The purpose of this society was to foster an integrative approach that
would promote interdisciplinary scientific communication between basic
science researchers and clinicians or other health care practitioners.
This allowed Jim to meet distinguished physicians, psychologists, and
others who also made a lasting impression on him, including Stewart
Wolf, B. F. Skinner and John Dos Passos.
It was Gantt’s continued and very strong support that also
facilitated Jim's ability to subsequently obtain his faculty positions
at the Johns Hopkins Medical School, the University of Pennsylvania
Medical School, and finally, as Professor and Director of the
Psychophysiologic Clinic at the University of Maryland School of
Medicine. Here, Jim extended Gantt’s the "Effect of Person",
by studying how personal contact could influence the health of coronary
care unit patients.
Subsequent research on how human relationships influenced
cardiovascular health led to his 1978 best seller The Broken Heart: The Medical
Consequence of Loneliness
. This remarkable treatise
attracted widespread media attention here and abroad and
Jim’s life began to change dramatically. Shortly after it was
published, he saw a demonstration of a new computerized device that
could non-invasively monitor and record heart rate, systolic and
diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure on a
minute-to-minute basis. Since it was more accurate and convenient than
the conventional auscultatory method using a stethoscope it
significantly facilitated and enhanced his ability to evaluate the
effect of emotions and personal interactions on blood pressure and
heart rate. One of the first observations he made was the prompt and
impressive rise in blood pressure that occurred as soon as anyone
started to speak. The higher the resting blood pressure, the greater
the surges while talking. Although these were sometimes alarming,
especially in hypertensives, patients were completely unaware of
whether their blood pressures were low, normal or dangerously high.
Subsequent studies showed that blood pressure surges while talking were
influenced by numerous other factors and his research efforts
concentrated on identifying the mechanisms responsible for these varied
effects and how this information could be utilized to help his
patients. Due to space constraints, we were unable to discuss how this
research resulted in the publication of The Language of the Heart
and later A Cry Unheard,
much less his forthcoming Speaking
of Love
. In Part 2 of this interview, we will trace the
progressive evolution of his exploration of the physiological effects
and medical consequences of human interrelationships that I believe can
be illustrated in an orderly fashion by each of these books.
PJR:
We are up to the time when I joined in your research by using the
Dinamap device in my own practice and was initially similarly skeptical
about its accuracy because of the dramatic but silent surges in blood
pressure when patients started to speak. I was also able to confirm
your findings about various factors that influenced these spikes.
Perhaps you could comment further on these research studies and how
they led to the publication in 1983 of The Language of The Heart: The
Body's Response to Human Dialogue
.
JJL:
The subtitle noted above was actually added by Martin Kessler and was
published without my ever having seen it, since I had complete
confidence in his judgment. Martin was an excellent editor, president
of Basic Books and a marvelous man whom I greatly admired. However, I
was startled when I saw this subtitle that presumably described what
the book was about. The central theme of The Language of The Heart
was to attack Descartes’ mind/body split but I felt that this
subtitle appeared to support it. The
human heart does not respond to dialogue, it is inextricably involved
in this as well as all other forms of communication with others.
It was unsettling to realize that someone with Martin's keen intellect
had not recognized this important distinction and I realized that I
would face an uphill battle in trying to get the public to grasp this
critical if not crucial issue. When I voiced my concerns to Martin he
graciously agreed to change the paperback subtitle to The Human Body in Dialogue,
which was precisely what this book was all about. This Cartesian
separation and disassociation between mind and body — the
extraction of human speech from the body, as if talking were solely an
attribute of an amorphous mind/soul — still dominates
clinical medicine, and is a problem I frequently face when treating
cardiac patients.
Although stress management is mandated by the American Heart
Association, most cardiac patients are understandably uneasy about
seeing a "shrink" for problems they uncritically assume to be linked to
genetic predisposition, diabetes, diet, smoking, cholesterol and lack
of exercise. Without the support of cardiologists, like Jeffrey
Quartner, director of a large cardiac rehabilitation program in
Baltimore, most patients with coronary disease would be reluctant to
enter a program designed to help them reduce or manage stress. I often
see these patients shortly after they have finished exercising, which
they understand helps to improve the function of their "heart pump" as
part of their overall rehabilitation program. Most had also undergone
coronary bypass, the insertion of stents or angioplasty. These again
are primarily plumbing procedures to promote the pump’s power
by physically overcoming obstructions to blood flow. The whole medical
metaphor is that their hearts are merely pumping machines with problems
that can only be corrected by some mechanical means. Therefore, when I
first meet these patients I ask them "Do
you think that you and your heart pump are two separate entities?
What other pump not only talks, but wants to be understood?" They often
smiled when I asked if they believed that they and their bodies are two
separate entities or if they rented their bodies from Hertz or Avis. I
would then show them graphs vividly demonstrating that virtually all
cardiac rehabilitation patients exhibit far greater rises in blood
pressure when they talk than during maximal treadmill exercising. In
addition, these impressive increases occur despite the fact that they
are often on as many as six different drugs designed to reduce their
blood pressure and regulate their heart rate.
In addition to studies with cardiac rehabilitation patients, we carried
out a large number of psychosocial and interpersonal investigations in
an effort to further define the nature of the varied links and factors
that influenced blood pressure surges while speaking. We showed that
pressure rises as soon as people begin to talk at all ages. We further
documented a linear correlation between the degrees of these blood
pressure surges with advancing age. The elderly showed particularly
high increases, probably due in part to progressive atherosclerosis and
loss of plasticity in their peripheral arteries. These observations
helped to explain why many clinicians suggested that senior citizens
have a daily cocktail or glass or two of wine, since the vasodilating
effects of alcohol could contribute to their cardiovascular health,
especially when talking.
Type A
Behavior Pattern, Schizophrenia, Pets And Blood Pressure
Other studies demonstrated that the rate and volume of speech were
clearly correlated with the magnitude of pressure increases. Rapid,
forceful speech triggered far greater rises when compared to speaking
the same words in a slower, softer and more relaxed manner. These
observations were particularly intriguing because Rosenman and Friedman
had shown that Type A Personalities were far more prone to develop
coronary heart disease than Type B's. The
defining characteristic of Type A behavior is an individual's vocal
stylistics and speech patterns.
While Type
A's exhibit
exaggerated cardiovascular responses to stress, the magnitude of these
increases in systolic and diastolic pressures are not adequately
appreciated when blood pressure is measured using a stethoscope, since
this requires silence from both doctor and patient during the
procedure. Sustained hypertension can lead to coronary disease but this
is not a Type A characteristic. I am quite confident that in the near
future, the bridging mechanisms explaining the linkages between Type A
and coronary heart disease will prove to be the repetitive spikes in
blood pressure that damage the inner surface of coronary arteries when
people speak in a rapid, forceful manner. As you and others have
emphasized, this type of "plosive" speech is a typical Type A trait.
Friedman and Rosenman also suggested that Type A people were "poor
listeners". They tended to think about what they were going to say next
and frequently interrupted others who were talking to emphasize their
own points. As we were able to show in dozens of studies, while
pressure rises rapidly when a person begins to speak, it quickly drops
below basal levels when listening to others. These typical Type A
communicative characteristics not only produce proportionately greater
increases in blood pressure while talking but blood pressures also fail
to fall back to basal levels when they stop. That's because instead of
listening to someone, they are constantly thinking of what to say next
and/or when to interrupt the speaker to disagree or even agree with
some statement. Thus, Type A's are caught in an upward spiral of
increasing blood pressure surges the longer they continue to talk or
try to communicate with others.
In addition to listening to others, blood pressure also falls when
people silently attend to the living world outside the confines of
their own skin. A good illustration of this can be found in the seminal
research of Aaron Katcher, a psychiatrist at the University of
Pennsylvania Medical School. After meeting him while on the Penn
faculty, Aaron subsequently collaborated in a number of our studies
that linked talking and listening to major upward and downward shifts
in blood pressure, a phenomenon we referred to as the "dialogical
seesaw". Aaron greatly extended these observations by demonstrating
that watching tropical fish swim in a tank could lower blood pressure
more than meditation and did pioneering studies on the blood pressure
reduction effects of tending to pets.
While continuing with a variety of basic research studies to assess
other aspects of how communication affected health, we also initiated
our first long-term investigation of factors determining the survival
of heart patients after they were released from the coronary care unit.
Tracking well over one hundred patients for extended periods, we
monitored virtually every conceivable physiological, psychosocial,
economic, and interpersonal variable that could possibly influence
long-term survival. It was no surprise to find that the extent of
ventricular damage was the strongest predictor of subsequent sudden
death. We were not prepared, however, for what was the
second strongest predictor of long-term survival, which was whether or
not the patient had a pet. Those without pets had a fourfold increase
in mortality rates compared to patients with pets!
We subsequently showed that the mere presence of a pet in a room with
children had a dramatic effect on lowering their basal blood pressures
and an equally powerful reduction in BP surges when these children read
a book aloud to a pet. Much to my surprise, these studies attracted
widespread media interest, including my participation in two different 60 Minutes
documentaries. It later led to the now popular practice of bringing
pets into nursing homes and health care facilities. A number of other
investigators subsequently confirmed that when children read to their
dogs, they had far fewer problems than when reading to adults. We began
to see a direct link between a child's perception of their self-worth
(as assessed by perceived intelligence) and the magnitude of pressure
increases when they read aloud. Black male children had by far the
greatest increases in pressure, even though they were reading a book
two grades below level and had no difficulty reading the book aloud.
Some of these pressure increases were 2-3 standard deviations above the
highest pressures recorded for children of that age and these were also
significantly blunted by reading to a pet. Again, the hidden dimension
of the links between status incongruity, factors influencing blood
pressure surges when speaking, and academic achievement, would be
demonstrated in a highly novel manner.
Aaron Katcher spearheaded all of our research on the role of animals in
health and deserves the major credit for our findings. I was reminded
of this when I was recently asked to give the keynote address for
Intermountain Therapy Animals, a non-profit Utah group that has
developed wonderful methods to bring dogs into schools to help children
with serious learning problems. Founded in 1993 as The Good Shepherd
Association, the name was changed in 1997 to more accurately reflect
what it did. Learning-disabled children are taught to read to dogs
instead of adults and the results have been so successful that there
are now chapters throughout the U.S. and in several foreign countries.
The establishment of this organization, as well as all of their
approaches, is based to a large extent on our research findings. Along
with the increasing practice of bringing pets into nursing homes, this
is another highly gratifying development that sprang from our simple
observations of the therapeutic benefits of pets on lowering blood
pressure and its surges during communication. These findings would
later play a crucial role in our ability to help patients lower their
blood pressure and reduce its rise when speaking to others.
PJR:
In that regard, your publications over two decades ago with Aaron
Katcher, Erika Friedmann and others on the cardioprotective effects of
pets and caring or tending to someone continue to be confirmed and
extended by others. An article in the August issue of Stress and Health
reported that simply watching a silent videotape of fishes, birds and
certain animals for 10 minutes significantly lowered heart rate and
blood pressure when compared to controls who were simply looking at a
blank screen. I think it is also important to discuss the evidence that
these marked blood pressure surges with speech, as well as sustained
hypertension in many patients, represent disturbances or defects in
communication. My recollection is that the only time we did not see
these spikes was in schizophrenic patients, possibly because they could
not or didn't care about communication with others. And it was not only
speaking or the physical exertion associated with talking to someone
since the same surges were seen in deaf mutes when they communicated
with others by sign language but not when they moved their hands in a
vigorous but meaningless fashion. Whom you were talking to, what you
were saying, and the presence of a pet also had varied effects and
perhaps you could comment on these observations and their significance.
JJL:
I am glad you brought up our paradoxical findings in schizophrenics,
which typically included a drop in blood pressure when they spoke. This
led me to do an extensive review of the literature on blood pressure in
schizophrenia that was also thoroughly discussed in The Language of the Heart
along with Type A behavior, pet ownership and other topics covered in
this Newsletter. Numerous studies had shown that schizophrenics tended
to have lower blood pressures than other institutionalized patients and
the population at large. The problem in evaluating this was that it
included paranoid, hebephrenic and catatonic schizophrenics and this
was further complicated by the advent of different antipsychotic
medications with unknown effects. Nevertheless, it seemed clear that
the more these patients were withdrawn the lower their pressures and
that this was reversed when social contact was increased. I was able to
confirm that schizophrenics participating in other well-controlled
research studies actually lowered their blood pressure when they
started to speak, whether or nor they were on their antipsychotic
medications. This effect was so impressively different, that in one
psychiatric hospital where 20% of the patients were schizophrenic, I
was able to blindly identify each one by their blood pressure speech
responses although I had no knowledge of the diagnosis of any of the
patients we tested. And I don't think that this lack of a blood
pressure rise when talking is because schizophrenics "do not care."
When they did engage in real dialogue, such as complaining about the
hospital food, they had astounding hypertensive blood pressure surges.
I have long suspected that schizophrenics are probably terrified when
they do get back in touch with communicative reality. Paul, I suspect
that someday this finding will have important therapeutic clinical
ramifications, especially if we stop focusing solely on treatment with
drugs and etiologies that are only neurological or genetic. The
puzzling communicative problems characteristic of schizophrenia are a
fertile field for future investigations that have the potential to
provide important insights into the nature of this disorder that could
lead to progress in developing safer and more effective treatment
approaches.
Another intriguing discovery during the course of our research studies
was that the perceived status of whom you were talking to determines
the magnitude of pressure increases. If a person perceived that they
were speaking to someone of much higher social status, then blood
pressure always rose to a greater degree than if they thought they were
talking to someone of lower status. This had major implications in
several respects. Epidemiologically, it
helped to clarify why blacks tend to have higher average blood
pressures than whites and why there is a direct and linear correlation
between educational status and basal blood pressures
.
Individuals with less education have higher resting blood pressures
than high school and college graduates even when they have attained a
similar degree of financial and social success. While most people
perceive that Type A traits increase as you climb the corporate ladder,
I was able to demonstrate in A
Cry Unheard
that there was also a direct and linear
correlation between less education and increased Type A behavior. The
reason for Type A inappropriate competitive behavior is a deep
underlying sense of insecurity and self-esteem as you and Ray Rosenman
explained in your 1997 Newsletter, "Social Support: The Supreme Stress
Stopper" and I quoted this section on page 174 and 175 of A Cry Unheard . In
a very real sense, those social/psychological forces that had led to a
lowering of self-esteem also resulted in marked blood pressure
increases when these individuals tried to communicate with others. As
you noted, we also showed that it was not simply speaking per se that
led to blood pressure increases, but rather the act of communicating.
We tested deaf individuals while signing and found that they had
virtually identical pressure increases while they used sign language as
people who used speech to communicate.
We began to assemble all of the information and knowledge gained from
our research results in an attempt to develop a highly effective
program that would help patients with cardiovascular and other
psychophysiological vascular disorders like migraine and Raynaud's to
manage and cope with their problems in a far more effective manner. Our
growing appreciation of the powerful ways that communication could
influence the autonomic or "involuntary" nervous system led us to
hypothesize that, if people had "talked their way into" troublesome
health disturbances, they could also be taught ways to listen and/or
"talk themselves out" of these problems. I described how we were able
to achieve this goal and devoted an Appendix to delineating this
treatment process that we referred to as "Transactional
Psychophysiology".
PJR:
The Appendix also referenced a forthcoming book entitled Transactional Psychophysiology:
A New Non-Drug Treatment For Stress-Related Disorders
by
you, me, Sue Thomas and Herb Gross that would expand on this, but that
we never got around to completing. However, as you noted in some recent
correspondence, "Talking was no longer conceived as a 'mental' but a
'biological' activity with infinite possibilities. A trillion cells
speaking to another trillion cells was the real language of our hearts
since blood pressure changes touched every cell in the human body. The
'language of the heart' was far more than poetic metaphor, just as the
'broken heart' was also an overwhelming medical reality." This reminded
me that I had not treated readers to any of your writing, a problem
recently faced when I was asked to write a Foreword to Stewart Wolf's
autobiography. I solved this by providing an excerpt from one of his
papers illustrating not only how well he wrote but how his broad
cultural background had enabled him to gain important insights into the
roots of his patients' problems. For the same reasons, I have appended
below the last two paragraphs of The
Language of the Heart
, which I often revisit because they
are so compelling and captivating.
|
Contained in the In Exitu of the
medieval Gregorian chant is the central drama of every human life.
Lonely, haunting, ascetic, stark, this hymn recalls the exile of the
Jews wandering in the wilderness of Sinai. It recalls the loneliness of
a tribe in exile, the distress of having no place to live, the restless
quest for a homeland, a promised land where one could live a life
shared with others in Jerusalem. Throughout this book, patient after
patient has recounted painful aspects of this human drama as each
person, in exile from his or her own body, has sought relentlessly to
find some home, some sense of place, some way of relating to others and
an end to their engulfing isolation and loneliness. And, as these
patients' suffering has made clear, to be unable to live in one's body
is to have no place to live. It is a life of exile. To find one's home
and to rediscover one's own body is to discover a life with others in
the Jerusalem of the human heart.
At times I have
found myself trembling when meeting the eyes of a patient -- looking at
me, searching, hoping earnestly to discover for the first time the
emotional meaning of his or her elevated blood pressure, rapid heart
rate, or freezing hands. At such moments I have felt
Schrödinger's reality -- deeply felt it -- for surely there is
far more to their eyes than optical sensors whose only function is to
detect light quanta. And I have trembled then precisely because I have
caught a glimpse of the infinite universe behind those eyes and the
reality of a universal Logos uniting us in dialogue. And it is at such
moments, in the quiet sharing of reason and feelings in dialogue, that
I have felt most alive and human.
|
You indicated that your
studies with school children demonstrated major increases in pressure
when they read a book aloud to the teacher and classmates. The fact
that these surges were blunted when they read to a pet implies that the
magnitude of such increases also had much to do with these children's
perceptions of their own relative self-worth. Is that what led you to
write A Cry Unheard:
New Insights into the Medical Consequences of Loneliness
?
I am not implying that I was responsible for this subtitle but my
review of the first draft happened to coincide with the 20th
anniversary of the publication of The
Broken Heart
. I do recall suggesting that some reference
to this would be particularly appropriate since you now seemed to be
revisiting and expanding on "The Medical Consequences of Loneliness",
especially in children with educational deficiencies.
JJL:
You are absolutely correct. In a study published in the NIH Bulletin we
suggested that attention to these pressure increases while reading
might help children read in a much less taxing physiological manner. As
we continued our studies with children I also began to suspect that
what children experienced in school might have a significant effect on
their long-term survival. I would later show that school failure was
one of the leading causes of premature death in America and throughout
the industrialized world. Failure in school destroyed a person's
capacity to talk to others perceived as superior without repetitive and
severe physiological stress. I then extended the concept of loneliness
by tracing its roots back to childhood and decided to write an updated
and expanded version of The
Broken Heart
. In A
Cry Unheard
I again linked marital status to health and
illness, while broadening my horizons to integrate all of the
communicative surges in blood pressure that we had observed in
children. Prior to these observations we really had not focused on
childhood experiences as a major risk factor for subsequent heart
disease. Nor had I considered or speculated about loneliness from a
developmental perspective with respect to possibly posing a potential
major health problem for children in later life. I subsequently came to
the realization that one of the major forces that shapes a child's
capacity to communicate in a relatively stress free manner is the
school system. And just as I had demonstrated in adults, I documented
how school
failure is perhaps the greatest single cause of premature death in the
modern world. I was also able to prove that there is a striking linear
relationship between years spent in school and long-term survival.
Dropping out of school before the tenth grade was linked to losing 20
years of life!
As noted on page 2 of A Cry Unheard,
health experts report that if the death rates for white Americans with
less than ten years of schooling were the same as for college
graduates, there would be at least 250,000 fewer deaths in the U.S.
annually. This ratio would be as high or even higher for blacks and
Hispanics. The incidence of all types of heart disease increases as
education decreases and this stunning relationship is not due to
increased poverty or poorer access to medical care.
Peter Jennings may be a good illustration of this. He died at age 57
and had been divorced three times. He obviously developed lung cancer
from smoking. All his life Peter Jennings had lamented the fact that he
had dropped out of high school. Though he could communicate from the
safety of an isolated TV camera, he apparently remained aloof and
isolated in his personal life. In commenting on white men working in
well-paying jobs, I asserted in A
Cry Unheard
, "Though they did not have much in common with
residents of Harlem or Watts, some in fact, shared one thing in common
— low education. And this one marker, in spite of all other
advantages, seemed to exact a toll not unlike that seen in the heart of
the ghetto itself …. Like a hound dog tracking an escapee,
the onus of low education seemed to offer little escape for these
working men. No matter how hard they worked, or how much money they
earned, or how far up the corporate ladder they climbed, they were
apparently unable to outrun the baying of their own shattered
self-esteem. In the end, their lonely fugitive life exhausted their
hearts, and they too were caught by the same hound that has imprisoned
the men of Harlem and Watts for generations."
The destruction of
self-esteem inherent in school failure ultimately forces many victims
between a "rock and a hard place" with respect to establishing good
relationships with others. An attempt to escape through isolation
becomes equally unbearable, forcing those so trapped to pick their own
poison or to allow nature to take its own course. These lethal
consequences result from an inability to communicate effectively and
without the distress (that people are unaware of) when they have been
made to feel inferior to others because of educational deficiencies.
All of our studies support this conclusion. When teachers speak to
their students, they reach their hearts as well as their ears.
Descartes would have us believe that a child's body is little more than
a lunch box that carries a mind to class. My goal in A Cry Unheard was
to dispel this dangerous but common delusion and to highlight the
hidden hazards of educational failure as a major way to literally as
well as figuratively break a child’s heart.
PJR:
You also emphasized why this was a particular problem in minority
groups, especially immigrants with language difficulties and suggested
various steps that schools should consider to anticipate or ameliorate
these and other educational deficiencies. In addition, in considering
some of its main messages, you had some intriguing speculations towards
the end of the book about the origins of human speech that I would also
like to share with our readers.
|
As we consider
this book’s central issues, it might be helpful to reflect
briefly on the potential, albeit hypothetical, origin of human speech.
Dialogue is the "elixir of life" because it may be Divine in origin! It
is, to say the least, a sobering and humbling perspective; certainly
one that gives language a far richer and more awesome potential.
Language resides
in its biological home in the human body, and emerges as potentially
Divine, because it is in fact biologically infinite in its potential.
"Love", one of many felt words that describe one's own feelings, is
spoken in a trillion cells, and thus understood to be biologically
infinite when spoken in dialogue with another human being with his or
her own cellular nature. And if that notion appears to be unsettling or
mind-boggling, it does help one to understand how language could at
least be biologically infinite in its potential and Divine in its
origins!
From this
linguistic perspective, "Paradise Lost" could also be cast in a new
light. First, we are informed that the Creator decided "it is not good
for man to be alone". With the arrival of Eve, created from Adam's rib,
a new, indeed astonishing and potentially self-limiting word would have
to have emerged from Adam's lips. For in the creation of Eve, the word
I would have to be born. Conversing with Eve for the first time, Adam
would have been required to recognize the existence of another human
being, a "you" that necessarily required an "I" to engage "the other"
in dialogue. This "self-concept", first born in Paradise, would have
posed a variety of problems. All sorts of "self-concepts" and
"self-centered" words were potentially added to Adam's lexicon.
The self-concept
of "male" is now given meaning because of the arrival of a "female".
"I" is a separate entity, separated from the "you", and thus
potentially separate and distinct from the rest of Adam's world in
Paradise. "Adama", first assigned the task of naming the animals,
suddenly is confronted with the problem of "naming" himself! He is also
assigned the task of "naming the creature" taken from his own rib. It
was potentially a trap, one that paved the way for "the fall"
— I alone, and now separated from "you", an "I" that is also
separated from the rest of Paradise, an "I" quite distinct and
different than Eve! It might very well have been the concept of "I" as
a separate and distinct entity that led Adam down the slippery slope
that led him and Eve to the Gates East of Eden.
|
You then state that the
apple was forbidden to be eaten because as the "fruit of knowledge", it
would awaken an awareness of "good and evil" that could further a
separation from God and Nature, rather than being more connected with
them. You describe Paradise as a place where everyone lives in harmony
and perfect union with each other and the rest of Nature since
separateness does not exist and therefore there can be no loneliness.
As a result,
|
Perhaps it is we,
trapped in varying degrees of separateness, denying our own loneliness,
… who create the communicative equivalent of Paradise Lost.
Perhaps as self-centered "ego-centric" creatures, we have wandered far
away from out own origins. Perhaps loneliness itself is the measure of
how far we have strayed from that perfect union, not only from each
other, but from the rest of the living world as well! Even if the story
of Adam and Eve, and their fall, is entirely metaphorical, it does help
define the journey we must take.
For it is dialogue
that offers the hope of uniting us, not only with one another, but with
the rest of the living world. It is dialogue that unites, and dialogue
that ends our separation and isolation, because it links us back to our
origins, back to that which is biologically infinite and, if one is so
inclined, back to that which is potentially Divine. Dialogue unites
— dialogue abolished the "I" of separateness. Dialogue is the
vehicle that takes us back towards the paradise of union with others.
It is dialogue, real dialogue, which fuels our journey through life.
|
As I noted in Part 1 of
this interview, the first paragraph of The Broken Heart
begins with "There is a widespread belief in our modern culture that
love is a word with no meaning" and that "You can be intimate with
someone and then leave, and nothing bad will happen." While it would
appear that Speaking of
Love
deals with a topic that has probably preoccupied
you for over thirty years, what insights into love did A Cry Unheard
provide that stimulated you to write this new book?
JJL:
Let me begin by commenting on your first reaction to what I hope to
accomplish in Speaking
of Love
. I am not as interested in the disconnected way
that e-mails, letters and cards can be used to convey love, although I
agree that this has become progressively prevalent as electronic forms
of communication are increasingly adopted. I am much more concerned by
the way more and more people now speak outside of their own bodies
about love. This extraction of speech via electronic methods of
communication can, if we are not careful, perfectly mimic the
pathological mode of communication exhibited by patients with serious
personality disorders. Such people can speak about love literally from
"no place" (including their hearts) and therefore also speak of love to
"no-body". It is a type of disembodied means of communication that, for
example, allows politicians to stare with great conviction into a
television camera and assert that "I feel your pain".
Although he never developed the concept further, Freud stated, "The
ego is first and foremost a bodily ego". Today, except for its use as a
sexual object, many people find their ego, their sense of worth,
outside their true bodily selves, in money, power or prestige.
What has been lost is the awareness that ego and one’s
concept of an "I" can only exist in a heartfelt dialogue with others.
There can be no "I" unless there is a "YOU". Love in such a dialogue is
first a noun that is then converted into a transitive verb that crosses
over to the other, the "YOU". I suspect that these speculative
ramblings may be too abstruse for many readers to fully comprehend and
I am attempting to bridge this gap in Speaking of Love.
My goal is to discuss these complex aspects of "love incarnate" in some
manner that will hopefully stem or reverse the epidemic of loneliness
and alienation that seems to be mushrooming in our midst.
PJR: How far along
have you gotten with Speaking
of Love
and when do you think it will be published? Have
you chosen a subtitle for this book or could you list the titles of
some of the chapters that might help explain its purpose or topics you
intend to discuss? Can you give us an excerpt of something in your
initial draft that would provide a clue?
JJL:
There are any number of subtitles that might fit, such as
"Rediscovering the Heart of Dialogue" or "Reclaiming the Heart of
Dialogue". But my book must address a number of issues —
complex issues that I hope I can describe without losing most readers,
such as the way Descartes and Darwin joined forces to remove issues of
love from language, and thus extracted issues of love from the human
heart. The chapter describing these issues on this might be entitled
something like "The Day The Apes Began to Love" or alternatively, "The
Day The Universe Was Stolen From God". As you well know, I have long
held a passionate desire to expose certain issues regarding Darwinian
assumptions that have been consistently ignored or overlooked. A prime
example is his discussion in The
Descent of Man
, where he favorably quoted other authors
who suggested that the Irish were the possible missing link between man
and apes. In contrast to the "Noble Scots", there were the "Ignoble
Celts . . . who breed like rabbits and who will die like rabbits". This
was about a decade after millions of Irish had died in the Great
Famine. Although I would like to believe that Darwin would have been
appalled, it only took 50 years for similar assertions of racial
inferiority to waft across the English Channel and North Sea. Millions
more would subsequently be slaughtered as "Untermenschen" by others who
conceived of themselves as part of a master race "Herrenrasse,
Herrenvolk". Never in the history of man has love been more absent from
the earth.
Putting
Darwin Back On Trial In Tennessee (Along With René
Descartes)
My objections to Darwin have nothing to do with Fundamentalist concerns
about evolution. Indeed, I believe their attacks on Darwin have been
counterproductive and very misleading, since they not only misinterpret
the meaning of man’s appearance in Genesis, but also attack
natural selection, which is biologically irrefutable. I believe that it is
the apes, not the Fundamentalists who should have taken Darwin to trial
— perhaps charging him with defamation of character for
linking them so closely to human beings
. The
simple fact
is that the Fundamentalists put the wrong book on trial!
No, I would like to take Darwin back to trial in Dayton, Tennessee, but
hardly for the purported crimes addressed in his first trial.
Unfortunately, the original trial was seriously flawed with respect to
explaining the central message of Genesis and what Darwin’s
worst crime was really all about. In fact, I
would like to take both Descartes and Darwin to trial for removing
language from our hearts, confusing the distinctions between emotions
and feelings, and ultimately removing issues of love from our hearts
.
It is Darwin’s book, The
Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals
and his
commentary on fear, pain, rage, hunger, weeping and love that need
careful scrutiny. In that book Darwin joined with Descartes and
actually reversed the very meaning of the Incarnation —
instead of "And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us", they
removed words from human flesh altogether! Perhaps my chief witnesses
at such a trial might be Aristotle, Bacon and Pascal because of their
truly profound philosophic perspectives* that the Cartesian
mind/body schism tried to destroy. Descartes and Darwin placed things
Divine somewhere out there East of Eden or on the other side of some
remote constellation — God removed from Nature, God removed
from our hearts, and everything else that was sacred in the heavens and
the earth rendered banal and trite . . . . nothing more and nothing
less than mere clockwork.
*
|
"Feelings
are words expressed in matter" (flesh and blood) – Aristotle,
De
Anima
, 350 B.C.
"To
conclude, therefore, let no man out of a weak conceit of sobriety, or
an ill-applied moderation, think or maintain, that a man can search too
far or be too well studied in the book of God's word, or in the book of
God's works; divinity or philosophy; but rather let men endeavour an
endless progress or proficience in both." – Sir Francis
Bacon, The Advancement
of Learning
, 1605
"The
heart has reasons that reason knows not of. We feel it in a thousand
things. . . . . do you love by reason?" – Blaise Pascal, Pensées,
1670
|
Perhaps then I can rest
more easily on Valentine's Day, knowing that in my own life I tried to
preserve that special day for our grandchildren and all future children
by restoring love as a word spoken in and through our flesh and blood,
from our hearts. Perhaps I might experience an even greater sense of
satisfaction if I could also help to restore the human heart to the
center of all educational life by helping parents and teachers to see
on-line the heart of all dialogue in their children æ and to
enable parents and teachers alike to better understand that language
spoken in our flesh and blood is as complex and infinite as the
galaxies. Such an understanding and appreciation would be a wonderful
way to pass something on to future generations that is truly precious.
Finally, Paul, I might never again get the opportunity to do so in such
a public way, but I will always be grateful for all your help in this
quest, and for making this long research journey together. Your heart
and soul, indeed a great deal of your treasure (your Yeshiva Bucher
scholarly spirit, your love of ideas) have been gifts that sustained me
over the years. For that, and the privilege of your friendship for over
a quarter century, you have my heartfelt thanks.
PJR:
Since you insisted on including this last paragraph and at the risk of
sounding like some Mutual Admiration Society, the truth is that I have
learned much more from you than vice versa. In addition, the pleasure
and privilege of working with you has been all mine. This interview has
been a very special delight for me and I look forward to many more
years of collaboration and keeping our readers updated on your progress
with Speaking of Love.
I should add that Jim has arranged for copies of A Cry Unheard: New Insights Into
the Medical Consequences of Loneliness
to be made
available for $12.00 plus postage (instead of $25.99) by contacting
Kathy Laramore at kathy@lifecarehealth.com
or by calling her at 1-410-321-5781. Information on reduced prices of
other books is available at www.lifecarehealth.com,
which has a description of his Life Care Health Clinic and Foundation.
I would also urge you to visit www.mesicsfitness.com/mradio.asp
to listen to an interview with Jim. This is one of the web sites
maintained by Dr. James Manganiello, a Harvard psychologist who has a
very informative and popular radio program. This site contains similar
interviews with other prominent researchers and scientists on various
topics devoted to health enhancement and improving the quality of life.
A future interview with Jim is in the works.
Books
by James J. Lynch
|
The Broken Heart: The Medical
Consequences of Loneliness
(New York: Basic Books, 1977)
ISBN: 0-465-00772-4 (cloth)
ISBN: 0-465-00771-6 (paper)
|
|
The Language of the Heart: The
Body’s Response to Human Dialogue
(New York:
Basic Books, 1985)
ISBN: 0-465-03795-X
|
|
A Cry Unheard: New Insights into
the Medical Consequences of Loneliness
(Maryland:
Bancroft Press, 2000)
ISBN: 1-890862-11-8
|
|